Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you have actually safely connected to the.gov website. Share sensitive info just on authorities, safe sites.

- About - The Attorney general of the United States

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  wsj.com
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report an Infraction
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Attorney general of the United States ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Rights FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=" About" About
• The Chief law officer
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=" News" News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Liberty Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct companies of housing, such as property managers and property business along with other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loaning organizations and property owners insurance provider whose prejudiced practices make housing not available to individuals due to the fact that of:
  
  race or color. religious beliefs. sex. nationwide origin. familial status, or. impairment.
  
  In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department may submit fit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises an issue of basic public importance. Where force or risk of force is used to deny or interfere with reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers treatments for managing individual complaints of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have been victims of a prohibited housing practice, might submit a problem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own claim in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of individuals based on recommendations from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  One of the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The majority of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing providers attempt to camouflage their discrimination by providing incorrect details about availability of housing, either saying that nothing was offered or guiding homeseekers to certain locations based upon race. Individuals who receive such incorrect information or misdirection may have no knowledge that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought many cases alleging this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to reveal this type of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible liable. The majority of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually declared discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually also declared that towns and other local federal government entities broke the Fair Housing Act when they denied permits or zoning changes for housing developments, or relegated them to primarily minority areas, since the prospective citizens were anticipated to be mainly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon religion. This prohibition covers instances of overt discrimination against members of a specific religion too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to limit the use of private homes as a locations of worship. The variety of cases filed because 1968 declaring religious discrimination is little in comparison to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does consist of a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing run by a religious company to reserve such housing to individuals of the very same religious beliefs.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Recently, the Department's focus in this has been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are bad, and with minimal housing options, often have little option but to tolerate the humiliation and destruction of sexual harassment or threat having their families and themselves removed from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is aimed at proprietors who create an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from tenants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to acquire relief for renters who have actually been dealt with unjustly by a property manager since of sex and likewise prevent other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning may also adversely affect females, particularly minority ladies. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual's birth or where his or her forefathers originated. Census information indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus municipal federal governments that have attempted to lower or restrict the variety of Hispanic households that might reside in their communities. We have actually sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually imposed more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic customers. The Department has actually likewise sued loan providers for discrimination versus Native Americans. Other locations of the country have actually experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This includes brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other parts of Eastern Europe. We have actually taken action versus private proprietors who have actually victimized such people.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing versus households with kids under 18. In addition to restricting an outright rejection of housing to households with kids, the Act likewise prevents housing suppliers from enforcing any unique requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of kids. For example, landlords might not find households with kids in any single portion of a complex, place an unreasonable limitation on the total number of individuals who may live in a house, or restrict their access to recreational services supplied to other occupants. In the majority of circumstances, the changed Fair Housing Act forbids a housing provider from declining to rent or sell to households with kids. However, some facilities might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually released policies and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all types of housing transactions. The Act specifies persons with a special needs to suggest those individuals with mental or physical problems that substantially restrict several major life activities. The term psychological or physical problems might include conditions such as blindness, hearing impairment, movement disability, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, persistent tiredness, discovering impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term significant life activity may include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, taking care of one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise protects persons who have a record of such an impairment, or are related to as having such a problems. Current users of illegal illegal drugs, individuals founded guilty for unlawful manufacture or circulation of an illegal drug, sex transgressors, and juvenile offenders are not thought about handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no securities to individuals with or without disabilities who present a direct danger to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone poses such a direct danger must be made on a customized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based on general presumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for persons with specials needs has focused on 2 major locations. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other policies worrying land use are not used to impede the residential options of these individuals, consisting of unnecessarily limiting common, or gather together, residential plans, such as group homes. The second location is insuring that newly built multifamily housing is developed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's availability requirements so that it is accessible to and usable by people with specials needs, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination versus individuals with specials needs, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is implemented by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  
  Some individuals with specials needs might cohabit in congregate living arrangements, often referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other local government entities from making zoning or land use choices or executing land use policies that exclude or otherwise victimize people with impairments. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
  
  - To utilize land use policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with impairments less positively than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance restricting housing for persons with disabilities or a particular type of impairment, such as psychological illness, from finding in a specific area, while permitting other groups of unrelated people to live together in that location.
• To act against, or deny an authorization, for a home because of the special needs of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building permit for a home because it was planned to offer housing for persons with mental retardation.
• To refuse to make sensible accommodations in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings may be needed to pay for persons or groups of individuals with specials needs an equal chance to utilize and take pleasure in housing. What constitutes an affordable accommodation is a case-by-case determination. Not all asked for modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. If an asked for adjustment enforces an undue financial or administrative burden on a city government, or if a modification produces a basic modification in a city government's land usage and zoning plan, it is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  
  The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing versus individuals with specials needs to include a failure "to create and construct" specific brand-new multi-family homes so that they are available to and functional by individuals with specials needs, and particularly individuals who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all newly constructed multi-family dwellings of four or more systems planned for very first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific features: an available entryway on an available route, available common and public use areas, doors adequately large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through each house, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible location, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and usable kitchens and bathrooms set up so that a wheelchair can navigate about the area.
  
  Developers, contractors, owners, and architects accountable for the style or building of new multi-family housing may be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to satisfy these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. The majority of the cases have actually been fixed by approval decrees offering a range of types of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other building requirements) that will offer making other housing units accessible