For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a pal - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the Mashiach, based in Israel, forum.pinoo.com.tr he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his variety, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear promise of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public information from a large range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector garagesale.es to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and links.gtanet.com.br hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain for how long I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.